How The Great Britain Was Scammed

It all started when some British officials, the American High Intelligence as well as  the MDC-Movement For Democratic Change( an opposition party in Zimbabwe) met in South Africa with 'THE FIVE GENERALS' of Nigeria.
The main agenda on board was a useful plan on how to overthrow the 'stubborn cat'  Robert Mugabe who had and still continues to  a thong in the flesh of the British.
 The five generals of Nigeria briefed them on how they had successfully master-minded  a coup d'etat in Nigeria which brought IBB to power- Ibrahim Babaginda.
With trust and mutual agreement all well and nicely sorted out, an initial amount of $12 million was agreed upon. The date and all necessary implementation were all sorted. The day for this dreadful incident was to be taken place the day the electoral results will be declared after the presidential elections.
According to reports,  the agreed amount was disbursed to the five generals in no time since there is indeed no time to waste. Action in the quickest possible time.
The question which therefore comes in mind is, why were the British soo  keen on overthrowing Bob Mugabe?
The answer here was simple, they were in hurry to stop the Zimbabwe's Land Reform Programme which had seen
Zimbabweans  of white descend losing their farms and lands.
Morgan Tsvangiri-the leader of MDC and the trustee of the British was then booked into luxurious hotel about 2km away from the State House.  I guess the question you will intend to ask is, why? Meikles Hotel to be exact.
Morgan was to take and steer the affairs of the country after the successful coup d'etat.
 The time came and the results were announced and as expected, Mugabe was victorious but the funniest part of the whole incident was that, the proposed plan failed to materialized. The so coup d'etat never took place even after days of declaration.
In a sudden turn of events 'the five generals of Nigeria'  explained that,  to 'operalise' the coup plan, a 'trigger' was now necessary. They therefore demanded an additional $3 million to pay off the remaining personnel  of Zimbabwe they had involved in the coup plan. Each personnel is said to had been paid an estimated $100,000.
The British obligingly sent the money thus raising their coup commitment to $15 million. And then they spent the next few days twiddling their fingers, waiting in vain for a development.
Are they still waiting? I can't tell.
That's how the Great Britain was ripped off of $15 million by some fake generals whose where about are no where to be found in a bogus coup.

Why Not Africa?

It is really sometimes absurd to watch or listen to the news of the foreign media. Most of the headlines making the news have to be with Africa.
Africa of course, making Africa popular in obviously the negative dimension. Daunting  Africa’s image.
        What does one see on media such as CNN, BBC and the likes?
Children with mouths wide open gaffing for food and houseflies moving in and out their mouths as their playgrounds.  Mothers who have trekked long distances in such of water.
Is this what Africa is indeed made of? The showing of some traditional dance moves. As if all that Africans do  to entertain themselves is to dance.
        Now let me move on to my question, why not Africa? Africa being the second largest continent after Asia is undoubtedly the richest continent on this planet. The untapped resources of Democratic Republic alone is estimated to be around $24 trillion, more than the GDP of the whole of Europe and America combined. But why then is Africa portrayed as the ‘dark’ continent amidst all its riches.
A continent considered to be rich in minerals but yet its inhabitants thrives, why?   And the answer to this is of the fact that Africa indeed lacks investors. But where do investors tend to invest? Amidst promising profits when one invests in Africa.  Investors from the west and the Americas tend to opt for Asia- a continent which will take the fastest Boeing 747 18 hours non-stop to fly investors as compared to 5 hours to get to Africa. But yet, investors opt for Asian countries.
   So why are investors overflying Africa to Asia?  Whiles the fact is that, investment in Africa yields higher returns in any part of the world.
I can hear you recounting the unusual litany of shortcomings ‘’Africa politicians are corrupt,’’
 ‘’ Insecurity’’,’’ ‘’poverty’’, etc. This mantra should not be the bases of overflying   Africa to Asia.
There is something  more to it than meets the eyes.
The Asian countries were not having conducive conditions for investment. They had their own fair share of problems-corruption, political instability, dictatorship, unskilled labour. But that did not prevent investors from developed countries from going there to invest.
Take Japan, Taiwan and South Korea for examples. Japan for instance fought a destructive war in the Asia neighborhood during World War Two bringing instability to the Asian continent.
So, why then is Africa not getting the support Asia had?

Hypocrisy at its Best

The double standards and high level of hypocrisy exhibited in this world is far outrageous.
The exhibition of this high level of hypocrisy  really calls for an alarm. The world is now full of leaders whose hypocrisy is far beyond measure.
Let me start with the issues of rebels. A rebel group we all know is a small group of notorious criminals which aim at derailing the progress of a country. Hence, one is in full support of numerous measures being put in place to destroy various rebel groups.
The Lords Resistance Army of Uganda, the Al- Shabab of Somalia and currently the Boko Haram of Nigeria who are against western education. All these are rebel groups being hunted down rigorously.
The hypocrisy comes in here. How come all these rebel groups are being hunted down? Obviously the answer is clear to all. They retard progress.
If so, how come the same rebels in Libya were supported by NATO backed by the UN?  Were the rebels in Libya not rebels? Is this not double standards  on the part of the world?
Supporting one rebel group and the next moment, condemning  the  other.
Whiles they are all rebels.
We do not sit with rebels, we rather destroy them.
Another great hypocrisy on the part of the world has to do with Syria and the Arab League.
Syria, a country with some civilians agitating for the end of  Al Saad government.
Their concern are indeed pure and of course legitimate. With most Syrians crying out for a democratic  rule. Wailing for change.
But the issue has to do with the Arab League led by a country  whose inhabitants had not voted for years and has no respect for women rights. A country where pity crimes like stealing is punishable by death.
Saudi Arabia is the country I am talking about. A country which fuels almost all the world’s  automobile but yet still in this 21st century does not allow women to drive or vote.
With such a country leading the Arab League and trying to impose sanctions on Al Assad and Syria as a whole to comply to democracy not being hypocrite?
When mere rights to vote and drive by women is  offensible to massive  lashings.
Is that not hypocrisy to the highest level?
Indeed this world is full of hypocrites.

 The bases of the overthrow of Brother Al- Gaddafi has to do with him being in power far too long and hence his immediate removal from power. But this man you seeked to overththrow and eventually murdered him is not the only one who had being in power far too long.
Paul Biya of Cameroun who had being and is still in power had being in office for over 29 years with the likes of Baba Jimmeh still in there.
Had the overththrow of Gaddafi not being purely political?
Did I say overthrow? Sorry, it had to be the death of Gaddafi, not being political and for pure selfish interest?

A death which the UN secretary hailed so much amid his hypocrital talks of condemning murder.

In fact this world is full of hypocrites.